Reporting / reviewing management effectiveness
Management effectiveness
Introduction
An MPA management plan (or plans) should not only explicitly detail the various management strategies that are, or will be, implemented in order to reach the goals of the MPA, but should contain objectives and indicators that are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Time-bound (SMART) using an appropriate monitoring programme [1].
The extent to which the MPA is meeting its goals should be defined by the management plan’s indicators and objectives. These should be regularly reviewed with management practices revised and adapted as needed based on by the results of monitoring. Reviews of management effectiveness is therefore integral to adaptive management [2].
However, simple biological measures (e.g., abundances of focal marine mammal species) that reflect the delivery of protected area goals are just one dimension of a review of management effectiveness. Management effectiveness may also refer to the adequacy and appropriateness of chosen management systems and processes in place, (the overall focus of the Marine Mammal Management Self-Assessment Tool) as well as the delivery of these management systems and processes [3].
Reviewing the effectiveness of marine mammal management
Ideally, an MPA should have conservation or recovery plans for marine mammal species. However, due to a range of factors, such as a species’ range or movement patterns, or a lack of available knowledge, many marine mammal species are instead subject to conservation (or recovery) plans at the national or regional levels or not at all.
Within MPAs, however, specific attention may be given to ‘focal’ marine mammal species, which includes species that are endemic, flagship, indicator, of economic value (such as for whale watching) or vulnerable. In these cases, MPA-specific vulnerability assessments or summaries of management actions that relate to a species (e.g. the Indo-Pacific humpback and Australian snubfin dolphins in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park) may be produced [4].
Regardless of whether there exist MPA-specific conservation plans for marine mammal species in the MPA, focal species of marine mammal should, if possible, be monitored (see Factsheet 13) and trends over time can be analysed with respect to the overall goals of the MPA [1].
Main management effectiveness evaluation tools
| Year | Organisation | Tool name |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | UICN | Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: Standard, Version 1.1 |
| 2015 | BIOPAMA / European Commission | Integrated Management Effectiveness Tool (IMET) |
| 2008 | UICN | Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management of Protected Areas (2nd edition) |
| 2008 | UNESCO | Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Toolkit Assessing management effectiveness of natural World Heritage sites |
| 2007 | WWF-World Bank | Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) – Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites: Second Edition |
| 2004 | World Bank | Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness Goals for Marine Protected Areas – Revised version |
| 2004 | UICN | How is your MPA doing? A Guidebook of Natural and Social Indicators for Evaluating Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness |
| 2003 | WWF | Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management Methodology (RAPPAM) |
| 2003 | World Bank | Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness Goals for Marine Protected Areas |
| 2003 | WWF- World Bank | Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) – Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites |
| 2000 | UICN | Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management of Protected Areas (First edition) |
Resources
& references
Additional resources
- Publication: IUCN WCPA Management Effectiveness
- Web page: Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Methodologies
References
[1] Journal: Evaluating Effectiveness A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas 2nd Edition
[2] Web page: Convention on Biological Diversity – Protected Areas Management Effectiveness
[3] Web page: Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (PAME)
[4] PDF: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2011). Indo-Pacific humpback and Australian snubfin dolphins – A Vulnerability Assessment for the Great Barrier Reef
Related news
Download pdf page:
Share this factsheets: